Page History

{excerpt:hidden=true}The standard pulley problem as an example of systems.{excerpt}

h2. Part A

!atwoods.png!

Atwood's Machine consists of two objects (of mass _m_~1~ and _m_~2~) hung over a pulley.  Treating the pulley as massless and frictionless and treating the rope as massless and of fixed length, find an expression for the size of the acceleration of the objects.

----

h4. Solution

Atwood's Machine is an excellent example of a problem that can be dealt with using many different definitions of the system.  We will solve it using two methods to showcase some of the pitfalls of constructing a system when a pulley is involved.

h4. Method 1

*Systems:*  Object 1 as a [point particle] and object 2 as a separate [point particle] system.  

*Interactions:* Each system is subject to external influences from the earth (gravity) and the rope (tension).

*Model:* [Point Particle Dynamics].

*Approach:*  We begin by treating each object separately.  We construct free body diagrams:

|!atwood1fbd.png!|!atwood2fbd.png!|

where the tension force on each of the objects is exactly the same size.

{info}It is important to recognize that the tension force acting on each object will be the same _only_ because of *three separate assumptions* stated in the problem:

# The pulley is massless.
# The pulley is frictionless.
# The rope is massless.

If any of these assumptions is unreasonable, the results we obtain would be wrong.{info}

Using the free body diagrams as a guide, we write Newton's 2nd Law for each object.  We consider only the _y_ direction, since the _x_ direction simply yields the equation 0 = 0.  Because everything is in the _y_ direction, we work with the magnitudes of the forces and explicitly include signs (rather than including lots of tedious "y" subscripts).

{latex}\begin{large}\[ T - m_{1}g = m_{1}a_{1,y} \]
\[ T-m_{2}g = m_{2}a_{2,y}\]\end{large}{latex}

To finish this problem, we must use the constraint on the acceleration.  The accelerations of objects 1 and 2 are constrained by the fixed length of the rope to be equal in size and opposite in magnitude.  If the masses are known, it makes sense to substitute in such a way as to find the positive acceleration.  In our case, we arbitrarily substitute for _a_~2~ using:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ a_{2,y} = -a_{1,y}\]\end{large}{latex}

giving:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ T - m_{2}g = -m_{2}a_{1,y}\]\end{large}{latex}

Eliminating the tension from the system of equations then gives:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ a_{1,y} = \frac{(m_{2}-m_{1})g}{m_{2}+m_{1}}\]\end{large}{latex}

Since the accelerations are the same size, we can characterize the acceleration of the system as:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ a = \left|\frac{(m_{2}-m_{1})g}{m_{2}+m_{1}}\right|\]\end{large}{latex}

----

h4. Method 2

A second method is to use a "math shortcut" by defining an unphysical system that replicates the mathematical features of the problem.  

*System:* Mathematical construction including the two objects and the rope connecting them.  

*Interactions:* External forces from gravity on each block.

*Model:* [Point Particle Dynamics].

*Approach:*  This method uses the fact that when a _massless, frictionless_ pulley is involved, the pulley has essentially no role in the system except to change the direction of forces.  Thus, the dynamics of Atwood's Machine are completely equivalent to the dynamics of the system sketched here:

!atwoodsB.png!

Of course, this system is anything _but_ physical.  The important point is that the mathematics are identical.  This trick of "straightening" the system is often useful when a massless, frictionless pulley is involved.  Note that we have chosen to draw the system in the _x_ direction instead of the _y_ direction to remind us that gravity will not pull in the same direction on each mass!  Thus, the free body diagram for the system looks like:

and the resulting form of Newton's 2nd Law is:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ m_{2}g - m_{1}g = (m_{1}+m_{2}) a \]\end{large}{latex}

so that again, the magnitude of the acceleration is:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ \left|\frac{(m_{2} -m_{1})g}{m_{1}+m_{2}}\right| \] \end{large}{latex}

----

h2. Part B

Find the tension in the rope in terms of the object masses and the acceleration of gravity.

h4. Solution

*Systems, Interactions and Model:*  As in Part A, Method 1.

*Approach:*  To find the tension, which is an internal force if we combine the two masses and rope into one system, we must return to the approach of Method 1, treating each object separately.  From our work in Part A, we actually have two expressions for the tension:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ T = m_{1}a_{1,y} + m_{1}g \]\end{large}{latex}

or 

{latex}\begin{large}\[ T = -m_{2}a_{1,y}+m_{2}g \]\end{large}{latex}

In *either* case, inputting our answer for _a_~1,y~ yields:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ T =\frac{2m_{1}m_{2}g}{m_{1}+m_{2}}\]\end{large}{latex}

----

h2. Part C

Part A makes it clear that the system of the two objects has an accelerating center of mass (provided the masses are not exactly equal).  Using the results of Method 1, we can find the acceleration to be:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ a_{cm,y} = \frac{m_{1}a_{1,y}+m_{2}a_{2,y}}{m_{1}+m_{2}} = \frac{m_{1}a_{1,y}-m_{2}a_{1,y}}{m_{1}+m_{2}} = \frac{(m_{1}-m_{2})(m_{2}-m_{1})g}{(m_{1}+m_{2})^{2}} \]\end{large}{latex}

Show that this center of mass acceleration is consistent with the sum of the external forces on the system.

h4. Solution

*Systems:*  The two objects, the pulley and the rope.  

*Interactions:* The system is subject to external forces from gravity and from the axle of the pulley.  We will also have to consider the pulley as an independent [point particle] system acted upon by the rope (tension) and by the axle.  

*Method:* [Point Particle Dynamics].

*Approach:*  A truly physical approach that incorporates both objects into one system must also include the pulley.  We begin with a picture and free body diagram for that system:

|!atwoodsyspic.png!|!atwoodsysfbd.png!|

{note}It is key to realize that although the pulley is massless and frictionless, it is acting to _support_ the system through a force exerted on it by the axle.  A simple way to see this is to consider what would happen to the system if the axle was removed.{note}

We can now write Newton's 2nd Law for the system:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ F_{A} - m_{1}g-m_{2}g = (m_{1}+m_{2})a_{cm,y}\]\end{large}{latex}

where _a_~cm~ is the acceleration of the system's center of mass.  

To find _F_~A~, we must use the free body diagram for the pulley:


The pulley is not accelerating, so we have:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ F_{A} - 2T = 0 \]\end{large}{latex}

Thus, using the results of Part B, we have:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ F_{A} = \frac{4m_{1}m_{2}g}{m_{1}+m_{2}}\]\end{large}{latex}

We can then substitute to find:

{latex}\begin{large}\[ \frac{4m_{2}m_{1}g}{m_{1}+m_{2}} - m_{1}g - m_{2}g = (m_{1}+m_{2})a_{cm,y} \]\end{large}{latex}

Which gives:

{latex}\begin{large}\[a_{cm}= \frac{(-m_{1}^{2} - m_{2}^{2} + 2m_{1}m_{2})g}{(m_{1}+m_{2})^{2}} = \frac{(m_{1}-m_{2})(m_{2}-m_{1})g}{(m_{1}+m_{2})^{2}} \]\end{large}{latex}

which agrees with the problem statement.

Note that it is impossible to understand the center of mass acceleration using our "mathematically equivalent" system of Part A Method 2.