...
Analysis
- Learnability
- Good: The buttons are labeled, and self explanatory. For the mass input stage, because the next sections are present but grayed out, it should be obvious that the user is meant to press submit to continue. Every other section either allows people to return without changing anything, or to change something and submit, with clear buttons to do so.
- Bad: If someone mistypes the name of the house on the account login, they will not receive any feedback. Bad:
- Efficiency
- Good: Most of the web site is rather efficient and streamlined, allowing for quick input of tasks, and quick editing of tasks.
- Bad: You cannot mass-delete tasks. The initial start-up is time consuming, as is adding multiple new tasks at once. The web site is designed for a streamlined house manager, who updates the web site as new problems arise.
- Safety
- Good: This system is relatively safe, as most of the aspects can be edited, including the budget, residents, and all tasks, scheduled and not. Most actions are reversible, and you can check your work on the mass-input stage before continuing.
- Bad: The only problems that may occur are in misspelling the name of the house, which, in login, simply does not log you in, or in creating a new account for the house, in which case, you can simply discard that web site and try again, as the account is not actually created until you first press the submit button. The other area which may cause concern is the editing of residents. The only way to change a resident's information is by deleting the resident, and adding the resident again.
...