...
Analysis
- Learnability
- Good: The buttons are labeled, and self explanatory. For the mass input stage, because the next sections are present but grayed out, it should be obvious that the user is meant to press submit to continue. Every other section either allows people to return without changing anything, or to change something and submit, with clear buttons to do so.
- Bad:Bad: If someone mistypes the name of the house on the account login, they will not receive any feedback.
- Efficiency
- Good: Most of the web site is rather efficient and streamlined, allowing for quick input of tasks, and quick editing of tasks.
- Bad: You cannot mass-delete tasks. The initial start-up is time consuming, as is adding multiple new tasks at once. The web site is designed for a streamlined house manager, who updates the web site as new problems arise.
- Safety
- Good: This system is relatively safe, as most of the aspects can be edited, including the budget, residents, and all tasks, scheduled and not. Most actions are reversible, and you can check your work on the mass-input stage before continuing.
- Bad: The only problems that may occur are in misspelling the name of the house, which, in login, simply does not log you in, or in creating a new account for the house, in which case, you can simply discard that web site and try again, as the account is not actually created until you first press the submit button. The other area which may cause concern is the editing of residents. The only way to change a resident's information is by deleting the resident, and adding the resident again.
Design 2
text/images
Analysis
...
Rachel goes the HManager website and logs in with an account that she created. She has already set up her account with a picture of the building that she manages. She sees a couple of buttons, she would first like to input the information about past projects that she has inherited from Greg. She decides to click on the project button and is taken to the Projects screen.
At the top of the screen is a navigation bar so Rachel can move between different aspects of the HManager application. When she initially logs in she sees an empty table with the just titles of each section. On the right side of the screen she sees an Add Project area. Using the information that Greg provided her she fills out the Add Project for the multiple projects that Greg has completed and was continually working on. She puts in the information about the date and the cost of each project. As she adds them she notices that the table on the left updates itself and only shows the projects with finish dates that haven't passed. She clicks on the View Completed Projects and sees the projects that have dates that have already passed on appear on the table.
When Rachel clicks on the entries in the table a smaller window pops up where she can edit a project. When a projects is completed she can return to this screen, click on the project and then edit the projects status whether it was start, in progress, or completed. She can close the smaller window and return to the normal screen. She is then curious about what her budget for the year looks like.
On the right side of the screen Rachel can see what the most recent expenses were in the building. Rachel sees what looks like a bar graph on the left side of the screen and takes a section of her budget and points to a specific date that in the year. She can see how much of her budget is left in relation to how much of the year is left. When she hovers over a section of the budget a window pops up. Giving a summary of the cost, description and the date that the project was completed.
Rachel then clicks on the building status to see an overview of the tasks on the floors. When she hovers over a floor she can see can quickly see the status of all the projects on the floor. A small dialogue appears that has the statuses of projects color coded and the dialogue will disappear when she is no longer hovering the mouse over a floor. Rachel decides to click on a floor and it takes her back to the Projects page where the table on the left of the screen is sorted with that floor appearing at the top.
Rachel wants to take a look at the projects that got submitted by students. She can give them priorities so that she can add them to the projects later when she realizes there is enough money in the budget to cover the requests for the students. She can add the suggestions from the students from the Student Request page which will automatically pre-fill the Add Project form with the information that has been entered by the student such as the floor the date and description.
Analysis
- Learnability
- Good: The titles of each page fit well with what the actual content of the page is. The color scheme in the building status would help the manager be able to quickly glance and see the status of projects on each floor. To add projects it is fairly straightforward filling in a form.
- Bad: It's not entirely clear when a user can click on a table entry and when they can't. For example in the table on the Student Request the entries are not clickable and there is a similar table on the Projects page. The way the budget is laid out for viewing will probably take a user a minute or two to figure out what is going on. It probably would not be initially clear to the user how the graph of the budget is updated since it is updated automatically based on project finish dates.
- Efficiency
- Good: It is very easy to quickly edit multiple tasks without having to move back and forth between two screens. A smaller window appears in front of the main window and when the person closes it the table will stay in the same order except the edited entry. The house manager can easily add a student request to projects without having to remember or write down all of the information to enter the project by manually having to navigate to the Projects Screen. The idea that clicking on table entries or a floor takes the house manager to the project page makes it efficient to change projects. The bar graph is a way that the manager can quickly compare their budget to the rest of the year.
- Bad: Only being able to edit (which includes making projects are complete) one project at a time might feel inefficiency to an experienced user.
- Safety
- Good: Projects can be edited from the projects screen. Though as mentioned in learnability it is not entirely clear that they can be edited from the project screen. Being able to only edit one project at a time helps with safety, but as mentioned earlier it could present a problem with efficiency for the experienced user.
- Bad:
Design 3
text/images
Analysis
...