Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Design Image Added

Figure 1: Final design of our project combines map view of open venue with venue listing per day of trip

...

Previous iterations cross referenced these separate views.  However when we implemented an older design, we found the screen space  limiting.  Image Added
Figure 2: GR4 design included a graph and a grid of buttons.

This grid of buttons was partially inspired by HipMunk’s booking interface.  The plan was to cross reference venue locations (pinpointed in the map view) with rows in this grid that indicated (over the course of the music tour’s length) available gig openings.  Clicking one of the buttons in this grid view would trigger the booking step (task 2).   

...

Our new approach uses only the full schedule view because it was counter intuitive to show a single day and the entire tour schedule separately. Additionally feedback from our paper prototype suggested that users wanted to be able to compare the booking they were currently making with those they had already booked on previous days.

Image Added
Figure 3: GR5: Map and a list of venues associated with each day

Additionally, up to GR5 , the map view had become more of an accessory to the user’s action.  The user was mainly engaged with the listing view which only provided schedule information.  This detracted from our  original objective which was to  inform musicians’ tour schedule based on geography.  

When we paper prototyped VenView we extensively tested how intermediate locations would be added and how to recognize the list of venues.  The first element that really clicked for our final implementation was the left column where users provided the dates of their tour and locations.  Since what made the interface up to this point exciting, was seeing the map populated with available venues it made sense  to demonstrate this responsiveness in our interface more often.  Therefore, our final design re-populates the map for each day of the tour.  The pins only indicate venues with available bookings for that day within the specifications set by the user in the left hand column (genre, venue capacity, path style).     Image Added
Figure 4: GR5 Design: Clicking on the marker in the map, or the venue name on the list, highlights it, and displays opening as a button.

When we originally interviewed musicians they mentioned that a longer tour  in addition to intermediate cities they’d also constrain where they traveled to based on particular venues they would want to hit.  Since Since in the the map view, a user can only reveal the name of the venue by clicking on a specific pin we decided to accompany the view with the list of the venue names.
Users book a venue by clicking the time label button beneath the venue name in this list.  After a user has booked a specific slot this button changes into an un-book button for that slot.  

We decided to break the calendar view into fifteen minute intervals based on our preliminary interviews with musicians who said this was the most minimum time that a gig could last.  This abstraction allowed for us to constrain slots so that only exactly one gig could be booked per slot.  

Image Added
Figure 5: GR5 design: clicking on book immediately pops up calendar showing the scheduled event.  We divided the calendar view into fifteen-minute slots motivated by our interviews with musicians.

Implementation

Route and Venues along the route

-       Our  Our application used the Google Maps API to get routes. It used the intermediate cities entered by the user as Waypoints to request from the Google direction renderer.
-       The The number of intermediate cities had to be limited to three to reduce calculations. The calculations ensure right behavior when removing the first city and adding a new one. i.e. The new one would be placed at the end and not as the first.  It also ensures that the cities are fed to the waypoints in a route in the right order.
-       The  The application used the Google Places API search to get venues within a 500 radius around the origin and destination. The initial design was meant to use this search service to get venues along the path, using the (longitude, latitude) of points along the path. However, Google restricts users from iterative calls to a service and the data along the path had to be hardcoded. That problem took a long time to figure out, it should of have been specified in the Google API documentation.

Venues: map and list

-       The  The system used random algorithms to choose venues open in a certain day, and similarly to choose the time openings of those venues ensuring no collision in time openings, yet allowing venues to be open on more than one day. This information was saved in a list that resets every time the application is restarted.
-  The application used Google markers to indicate venues that are open along the path at a given day. It used different colored markers to indicate venues: that are open, that have been booked in another day, and venues that are currently selected.
- The behavior between the list and the map: the application stored a list of venue names per day, and the longitude and latitude of a respective venue. This information was used to calibrate the venues on the list and the venues on the map. i.e. selecting a venue on the map would make the list scroll to it, highlight it and show its available bookings. Vice versa, selecting it on the list would make the marker on that venue change color to green and an information window would appear on the map, to give the user feedback of the venu’s location on the map.

...

User was a pianist friend. She does not perform very often but was quick to impersonate the role of an independent musician on tour.Heuristic evaluation

Did not notice date at top of the map: Heuristic: Safety, Learnability,  Severity: Major
User MajorUser was unable to distinguish at first that the map was for only one day. She ended up booking two venues that are very far apart on the same day.

Solve this by doing some user testing on how best to display the date to the user.

Had trouble locating venue: Heuristic: Efficiency. Severity: Minor
User spent a long time zooming in after selecting the venue to locate it on the map.
Solve this by: Zooming the map view into the venue whenever it is selected in the list adjacent to the graph.

Users double booked their schedule: Heuristic: Safety.  Severity: Catastrophic
User double booked an evening because the application did not have the capability to report a conflict. They were then confused about what happened.  “Where did my event go?”
Solve this by reporting conflicts in scheduling to the user. We would have to research what the best way of reporting conflicts.

User was surprised the calendar was static. Heuristic: Matches the real world. Severity: Major
User tried desperately to click on the calendar to view more details or to see if they can edit the booking.
Solve this by trying to create a more interactive schedule that matches the real world  display of calendars often allowing users to see details of the event and edit them.

Unclear what path style refers to in the design. Heuristic: Help + Documentation, overall Learnability. Severity: Major
Unfortunately this was a suability usability problem detected earlier which we didn’t get a chance to address.

Tester 2:

 

Solve this by giving the user a tooltip or hint about what it means. Also showing a clear change in path style when this parameter is changed. 

Tester 2:

MIT course 6 friend  in concert choir. Not exactly a touring artist but a performer and familiar with concerts.

Placement of “View Schedule” button. User wasn’t able to see it. User reported that it would have been better if it was placed on top of the list and not under it. Heuristic: Efficiency, Severity: minor.
Solve this by doing user testing to see the best place for the “view schedule” button and place it there.

Legend for marker colors. Heuristic: Learnability, Severity: minor
Solve this by inserting one under the “enter” button when the map appears

Color Choice. Dark Blue not best color for permanent reservations. Heuristic: Learnability. Severity: Cosmetic
Solve this by doing user testing to see the best color and use it

Cross-application Calendar. Be able to download scheduled events into Google Calendar. Heuristic: Efficiency. Severity: major.
Solve this by implementing google calendar in the application. That way it’s easier for the user.

Wiki Markup
*
Wiki Markup
MIT course 6 friend  in concert choir. Not exactly a touring artist but a performer and familiar with concerts.
Placement of “View Schedule” button. User wasn’t able to see it. User reported that it would have been better if it was placed on top of the list and not under it. Heuristic: Efficiency, Severity: minor.
+Solve this by+ doing user testing to see the best place for the “view schedule” button and place it there.
Legend for marker colors. Heuristic: Learnability, Severity: minor
+Solve this by+ inserting one under the “enter” button when the map appears
Color Choice. Dark Blue not best color for permanent reservations. Heuristic: Learnability. Severity: Cosmetic
+Solve this by+ doing user testing to see the best color and use it
Cross-application Calendar. Be able to download scheduled events into Google Calendar. Heuristic: Efficiency. Severity: major.
+Solve this by+ implementing google calendar in the application. That way it’s easier for the user.
Lack of geography knowledge.* Doesn’t know cities between two states to enter as intermediate cities. Heuristic: Efficiency, Severity: major.
+Solve this by+ making the map visible at an earlier stage of entering inputs. As in when the origin and destination are entered, the map appears showing the intermediate cities.
Ordered list. list orders venues from origin to destination \[Good: intuitive\]

...

Swiss saxophonist who we interviewed for GR1 and inspired much of the UI design. We got in touch and he was interested in seeing our work. He tours frequently.

Unclear that available destinations should only be in the USA:
Heuristic: Learnability, Severity: Minor.
No warning exists to indicate to the user that she should only pick locations within the USA. Heuristic: Learnability, Severity: Minor. 
Solve by: having
Having some warning message if the user tries to enter locations outside of teh the US

Path between pins seemed to indicate time/Unclear that map only indicated 1 day:
Heuristic: Learnability Severity: Major
It was not completely obvious that the displayed pins represented only one day. Since the user picked a long tour time + distance, she inferred that the represented pins must not be all available within the time span, but because the pins were drawn relative to a path, she thought some amount of time > 1 day was being represented. Heuristic: Learnability Severity: Major

Solve by:
- Incrementally drawing the path once venues have been booked. -Displaying open venues only a certain radius from the inferred position of the user (eg on day 1 of a five day tour, do not show openings at the final destination).

List and Pins correlate : (good) Number of pins match the number of venues listed. Once a pin is clicked, its corresponding venue is clicked (available times are displayed). Heuristic: Learnability + Efficiency (clicking either view begins “booking” transaction.

Unclear that Names Listed are Venue Names: Heuristic: Learnability, Severity: Major
Solve by: Labeling column of venue names.

Unclear as to how to initiate booking process:
User guessed that clicking venue names would display more info about the venue, not necessarily initiate the booking-process for that venue.
Solve by+: Labeling Venue-name column with “Book a Venue,” or automatically reveal available times for the first venue in the list (display buttons for different available times as if the first item had already been clicked to entice the user to either book those times or click other items in the list to display more information).

Tester 4
MIT friend with a music minor. Performed with gamelan group at MIT but otherwise does not tour.

Unclear location of venues. User doesn’t know where the venues are in the list. She prefers headers in the list separating venues in the origin, destination and the ones between cities. Heuristic: Learnability. Severity: Major.
Solve this by putting headers in the list that are greyed out, just to help the user visualize where the venues are.

...