| Section |
|---|
|
| Column |
|---|
| BioMate| Wiki Markup |
|---|
{html}<STYLE mce_bogus="1"><!--
.pagetree2 a{font-size:16px; }
--></STYLE>{html} |
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
{pagetree2:BioMate} |
Click on a page above for a specific section. |
| Column |
|---|
| The Group* Rebecca Taft
* Sumaiya Nazeen
* Avanti Shrikumar The ProblemLab-bench biologists find it difficult to use many existing tools for their data analysis. These tools are generally command-line computer programs written by computational biologists. Computational biologists do not have time to create user-friendly interfaces for their programs, and often find themselves spending a lot of time helping leb-bench biologists run their programs. This creates a burden for all involved: lab-bench biologists cannot move forward with their data analysis, and computational biologists cannot move forward with their research. |
|
Biologists lack technology that suits their needs and skill sets. We identified two main shortcomings: the first is difficulty in using code written by computational biologists. The second is a lack of a good system for tracking different variations of experimental procedures.
We are, in no particular order: Rebecca Taft, Sumaiya Nazeen, Michael Maddox, Avanti Shrikumar
GR1