Versions Compared

Old Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Andrew E Pawl

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Andrew E Pawl

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
Composition Setup
 Excerpt
hiddentrue
A more complicated version of the Bungee Jump problem. 
Image Added
 (Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons, uploaded by user Che010.)
Bungee cords designed to U.S. Military specifications (DoD standard 
...
 MIL-C-5651D, 
...
 available 
...
 at 
...
http://dodssp.daps.dla.mil
...
) 
...
 are 
...
 characterized 
...
 by 
...
 a 
...
 force 
...
 constant 
...
 times 
...
 unstretched 
...
 length 
...
 in 
...
 the 
...
 range 
...
kL
...
 ~ 
...
 800-1500 
...
 N. Jumpers using these cords intertwine three to five cords to make a thick rope that is strong enough to withstand the forces of the jump. Suppose that you are designing a bungee jump off of a bridge that is 30.0 m above the surface of a river running below. To get an idea for the maximum cord length, calculate the unstretched length of cord with kL = 4000 N (a system of five 800 N cords) that will result in a 118 kg jumper who leaves the bridge from rest ending their jump 2.0 m above the water's surface. (The 2.0 m builds in a safety margin for the height of the jumper, so you can neglect the height of the jumper in your calculation.) Since you are finding a maximum cord length, ignore any losses due to air resistance or dissipation in the cord. Ignore the mass of the rope.
Solution
 Toggle Cloak
idsys
 System: 
 Cloak
idsys
The jumper (treated as a ) plus the earth and the bungee cord.
 Toggle Cloak
idint
 Interactions: 
 Cloak
idint
The system constituents interact via gravity, which contributes gravitational potential energy, and via the restoring force of the cord, which contributes elastic potential energy. External influences are assumed negligible.
 Toggle Cloak
idmod
 Model: 
 Cloak
idmod
.
 Toggle Cloak
idapp
 Approach:
 Cloak
idapp
 Toggle Cloak
iddiag
 Diagrammatic Representation
 Cloak
iddiag
We begin with an initial-state final-state diagram for this situation, along with corresponding energy bar graphs. 
Image Added
Image Added
Initial State
Final State
 Cloak
diag
diag
 Toggle Cloak
idmath
 Mathematical Representation
 Cloak
idmath
As indicated in the picture, we have chosen the zero point of the height to be the river's surface. With these pictures in mind, we can set up the Law of Change for our model:
 Latex
  Bungee jumps using Military spec cords intertwine three to five cords to make the cord that the jumper uses. Suppose that you are designing a bungee jump off of a bridge that is 30.0 m above the surface of a river running below.  To get an idea for the maximum cord length, calculate the unstretched length of cord with _kL_ = 4000 N (a system of five 800 N cords) that will result in a 118 kg jumper who leaves the bridge from rest ending their jump 2.0 m above the water's surface.  (The 2.0 m builds in a safety margin for the height of the jumper, so you can neglect the height in your calculation.)  Since you are finding a maximum cord length, ignore any losses due to air resistance or dissipation in the cord.  Ignore the mass of the rope.

System:  The jumper (treated as a [point particle]) plus the earth and the bungee cord.  The system constituents interact via gravity, which contributes [gravitational potential energy], and via the restoring force of the cord, which contributes [elastic potential energy].  External influences are assumed negligible.

Model:  [Constant Mechanical Energy].

Approach:  

Shown above is an initial-state final-state diagram for this situation, along with corresponding energy bar graphs.  As indicated in the picture, we have chosen the zero point of the height to be the river's surface.  With these pictures in mind, we can set up the Law of Change for our model:

{latex}\begin{large} \[ E_{\rm i} = mgh_{\rm i} = E_{\rm f} = mgh_{\rm f} + \frac{1}{2}k x_{f}^{2} \] \end{large}{latex}

{info}Bungee cords provide a restoring force when stretched, but offer no resistance when 
 Info
Bungee cords provide a restoring force when stretched, but offer no resistance when "compressed", 
 
 since 
 
 they 
 
 fold 
 
 like 
 
 an 
 
 ordinary 
 
 rope. 
  
 Thus, 
 
 the 
 
 initial 
 
 spring 
 
 energy 
 
 is 
 
 zero 
 
 in 
 
 this 
 
 case. 
{info}


This 
...
 equation 
...
 cannot 
...
 be 
...
 solved 
...
 without 
...
 further 
...
 constraints, 
...
 since 
...
 we 
...
 do 
...
 not 
...
 know 
...
k
...
. 
...
 The 
...
 extra 
...
 constraint 
...
 that 
...
 we 
...
 have 
...
 is 
...
 given 
...
 by 
...
 the 
...
 fact 
...
 that 
...
 the 
...
 jumper 
...
 has 
...
 fallen 
...
 a 
...
 total 
...
 of 
...
 28.0 
...
 m 
...
 (descending 
...
 from 
...
 30.0 
...
 m 
...
 above 
...
 the 
...
 water 
...
 down 
...
 to 
...
 2.0 
...
 m 
...
 above 
...
 the 
...
 water). 
...
 This 
...
 distance 
...
 must 
...
 be 
...
 covered 
...
 by 
...
 the 
...
 stretched 
...
 cord. 
...
 This 
...
 gives 
...
 us 
...
 the 
...
 contraint:


{
 Latex
}\begin{large} \[ h_{\rm i} - h_{\rm f} = L + x_{f} \] \end{large}{latex}


Solving 
...
 this 
...
 constraint 
...
 for 
...
x
...
f and 
...
 substituting 
...
 into 
...
 the 
...
 energy 
...
 equation 
...
 gives:


{
 Latex
}\begin{large} \[ -2mg(\Delta h) = k((\Delta h)^{2} + 2 L \Delta h + L^{2}) \] \end{large}{latex}


Where 
...
 we 
...
 are 
...
 using Δh = hf - hi to simplify the expression.
 We still have two unknowns, but we can resolve this by using the fact that kL is a constant for the rope. Thus, if we multiply both sides by L, we have:
 Latex
 Δ_h_ = _h_~f~ - _h_~i~ to simplify the expression.
We still have two unknowns, but we can resolve this by using the fact that _kL_ is a constant for the rope.  Thus, if we multiply both sides by _L_, we have:

{latex}\begin{large} \[ -2mg(\Delta h)L = C((\Delta h)^{2} + 2L \Delta h + L^{2}) \] \end{large}{latex}


where 
...
 we 
...
 have 
...
 replaced 
...
 the 
...
 quantity 
...
kL
...
 by 
...
 C 
...
 (= 
...
 800 
...
 N) 
...
 for 
...
 clarity. 
...
 With 
...
 this 
...
 substitution, 
...
 it 
...
 can 
...
 be 
...
 seen 
...
 that 
...
 we 
...
 have 
...
 a 
...
 quadratic 
...
 equation 
...
 in 
...
L
...
 which 
...
 can 
...
 be 
...
 solved 
...
 to 
...
 find:


{
 Latex
}\begin{large} \[ L = \frac{-2(C+mg)\Delta h \pm \sqrt{4(C+mg)^{2} (\Delta h)^{2}-4C^{2}(\Delta h)^{2}}}{2C} = 13.3 \:{\rm m}\;{\rm or}\;58.9 \:{\rm m}\] \end{large}{latex}


It 
...
 is 
...
 clear 
...
 that 
...
 the 
...
 appropriate 
...
 choice 
...
 is 
...
 13.3 m. 
 Note
Does the other root have a physical meaning? 
 Tip
titleA Rule of Thumb
According to bungee jumping enthusiasts, a good rule of thumb is to expect that the maximum length reached by a bungee cord during a jump will be 210% of its unstretched length (assuming the cord is rated for the weight of the person jumping). Thus, a 10 m cord should stretch to 21 m during a jump. How does this rule of thumb compare to our calculated estimate? 
Follow Up – Checking Assumptions
In our constraint that:
 Latex
\begin{large}\[ h_{i} - h_{f} = L + x_{f} \] \end{large}
we neglected the fact that the jumper's center of mass might drop an extra meter or more (depending upon the point of attachment of the cord to the person). What effect would such an extra drop have on the final height?
Follow Up – Checking Assumptions
Suppose a 118 kg jumper foiled your calculations by leaping upward from the bridge with an initial speed of 2.25 m/s. Will the jumper hit the water, assuming the 13.3 m cord with kL = 4000 N that we found in Part A?
 Cloak
math
math
 m.  

h3. Part B 

Suppose a 118 kg jumper foiled your calculations by leaping upward from the bridge with an initial speed of 2.25 m/s.  Will the jumper hit the water, assuming you are using a 13.3 m cord with _kL_ = 4000 N?





 Cloak
app
app