You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 46 Next »

Unknown macro: {table}
Unknown macro: {tr}
Unknown macro: {td}
Error formatting macro: live-template: java.lang.NullPointerException
Unknown macro: {td}

Yun Yea-Ji (KOR) at the 2009 South Korean Figure Skating Championships
Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Consider an ice skater performing a spin. The ice is very nearly a frictionless surface

A skater spinning around has constant angular momentum, but can change his or her Moment of Interia by changing body position. What happens to their rate of rotation when they do so?

    Part A

    Assume that the skater originally is standing straight up while spinning, with arms extended. He or she then draws his or her arms inwards tightly to the sides. How does the angular velocity change?

    Solution

    System:

    Interactions:

    Model:

    Approach:

    Diagrammatic Representation

    Consider the skater intially as a massless vertical pole with the arms modeled as massless rods of length Li with a point mass m at each end.

    After contracting the skater's arms, the two masses are each a distance Lf from the body

    Mathematical Representation

    The definition of the Moment of Inertia is:

    Unknown macro: {latex}

    \begin

    Unknown macro: {large}

    [ I = \sum {m r^{2}} ] \end

    So that if we calculate the initial Moment of Inertia about the vertical pole that is the skater's torso, we get:

    Unknown macro: {latex}

    \begin

    Unknown macro: {large}

    [ I_

    Unknown macro: {rm i}

    = 2 m d_

    ] \end

    For the "final" configuration the Moment of Inertia becomes:

    Unknown macro: {latex}

    \begin

    Unknown macro: {large}

    [ I_

    Unknown macro: {rm f}

    = 2 m d_

    ] \end

    The Angular Momentum L has a magnitude given by

    Unknown macro: {latex}

    \begin

    Unknown macro: {large}

    [ L = I \omega ] \end

    so the initial angular momentum is

    Unknown macro: {latex}

    \begin

    Unknown macro: {large}

    [ L_

    Unknown macro: {rm i}

    = I_

    \omega_

    Unknown macro: {rm i}

    = 2 m d_

    \omega_

    Unknown macro: {rm i}

    ] \end

    and the final angular momentum is

    Unknown macro: {latex}

    \begin

    Unknown macro: {large}

    [ L_

    Unknown macro: {rm f}

    = I_

    \omega_

    Unknown macro: {rm f}

    = 2 m d_

    \omega_

    Unknown macro: {rm f}

    ] \end

    Since the Angular Momentum is unchanged, the initial and final expressions should be equal. This means that

    Unknown macro: {latex}

    \begin

    Unknown macro: {large}

    [ d_

    Unknown macro: {rm i}

    \omega_

    = d_

    Unknown macro: {rm f}

    \omega_

    ] \end

    or

    Unknown macro: {latex}

    \begin

    Unknown macro: {large}

    [\omega_

    Unknown macro: {rm f}

    = \omega_

    Unknown macro: {rm i}

    \frac{d_{\rm i}}{d_{\rm f}} ] \end

    After drawing in his or her arms, the skater is spinning much more rapidly, without the application of any external forces or torques.


    Part B

    Solution

    What if we address this from the standpoint of Energy? If the Energy is conserved (since there is no external work done on the system), then we ought to be able to derive the angular velocity from Conservation of Energy.

    From our expressions for Rotational Energy, we know that the energy is given by

    deck: com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException
    Error formatting macro: live-template: java.lang.NullPointerException
    • No labels