You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 25 Next »

Atwood's Machine consists of two objects (of mass m1 and m2) hung over a pulley.

Part A

Treating the pulley as massless and frictionless and treating the rope as massless and of fixed length, find an expression for the accelerations of the two masses.

Solution

Atwood's Machine is an excellent example of a problem that can be dealt with using many different definitions of the system. We will solve it using two methods to showcase some of the pitfalls of constructing a system when a pulley is involved.

Method 1

Systems:

Object 1 as a point particle and object 2 as a separate point particle system.


Interactions:

Each system is subject to external influences from the earth (gravity) and the rope (tension).


Model:

Approach:

Diagrammatic Representation

We begin by treating each object separately. We construct free body diagrams:

where the force of tension on each of the objects is exactly the same magnitude. The direction of the force is upwards for both masses because the rope is wrapped around the pulley, and thus hangs downwards at each end (and pulls upward at each end).

It is important to recognize that the tension force acting on each object will be the same only because of three separate assumptions stated in the problem:

  1. The pulley is massless.
  2. The pulley is frictionless.
  3. The rope is massless.

If any of these assumptions is unreasonable, the results we obtain would be wrong.

Mathematical Representation

Using the free body diagrams as a guide, we write Newton's 2nd Law for each object. We consider only the y direction, since the x direction simply yields the equation 0 = 0. Because everything is in the y direction, we work with the magnitudes of the forces and explicitly include signs (rather than including lots of tedious "y" subscripts).

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ T - m_

Unknown macro: {1} g = m_

a_

Unknown macro: {1,y}

]
[ T-m_

Unknown macro: {2} g = m_

a_

Unknown macro: {2,y}

]\end

To finish this problem, we must use the constraint on the acceleration. The accelerations of objects 1 and 2 are constrained by the fixed length of the rope to be equal in size and opposite in direction. It makes sense to use this fact to eliminate one of the accelerations in the above equations and thus obtain a single expression for the other in terms of the gravitational constant g and the two masses. In our case, we arbitrarily substitute for a2 using:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ a_

Unknown macro: {2,y}

= -a_

Unknown macro: {1,y}

]\end

giving:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ T - m_

Unknown macro: {2} g = -m_

a_

Unknown macro: {1,y}

]\end

Eliminating the tension from the system of equations then gives:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ a_

Unknown macro: {1,y}

= \frac{(m_

Unknown macro: {2}

-m_

Unknown macro: {1}

)g}{m_

+m_{1}}]\end

Since the accelerations are the same size, we can characterize the acceleration of the system as:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ a = \left|\frac{(m_

Unknown macro: {2}

-m_

Unknown macro: {1}

)g}{m_

+m_{1}}\right|]\end

Method 2

A second method is to use a "math shortcut" by defining an unphysical system that replicates the mathematical features of the problem.

System:

Mathematical construction including the two objects and the rope connecting them.


Interactions:

External forces from gravity on each block.


Model:

Approach:

deck: com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException

Part B

Find the tension in the rope in terms of the object masses and the acceleration of gravity.

Solution

Systems:

As in Part A, Method 1.


Interactions:

As in Part A, Method 1.


Model:

As in Part A, Method 1.


Approach:

Part C

Part A makes it clear that the system of the two objects has an accelerating center of mass (provided the masses are not exactly equal). Using the results of Method 1, we can find the acceleration to be:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ a_

Unknown macro: {cm,y}

= \frac{m_

Unknown macro: {1}

a_

Unknown macro: {1,y}

+m_

Unknown macro: {2}

a_{2,y}}{m_

+m_{2}} = \frac{m_

Unknown macro: {1}

a_

Unknown macro: {1,y}

-m_

Unknown macro: {2}

a_{1,y}}{m_

+m_{2}} = \frac{(m_

Unknown macro: {1}

-m_

Unknown macro: {2}

)(m_

-m_

)g}{(m_

Unknown macro: {1}

+m_

Unknown macro: {2}

)^{2}} ]\end

Show that this center of mass acceleration is consistent with the sum of the external forces on the system.

Solution

Systems:

The two objects, the pulley and the rope.


Interactions:

The system is subject to external forces from gravity and from the axle of the pulley. We will also have to consider the pulley as an independent point particle system acted upon by the rope (tension) and by the axle.


Method:

Approach:

Diagrammatic Representation

A truly physical approach that incorporates both objects into one system must also include the pulley. We begin with a picture and free body diagram for that system:

It is key to realize that although the pulley is massless and frictionless, it is acting to support the system through a force exerted on it by the axle. A simple way to see this is to consider what would happen to the system if the axle was removed.

Mathematical Representation

We can now write Newton's 2nd Law for the system:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ F_

Unknown macro: {A}

- m_

Unknown macro: {1}

g-m_

Unknown macro: {2}

g = (m_

+m_

Unknown macro: {2}

)a_

Unknown macro: {cm,y}

]\end

where acm is the acceleration of the system's center of mass.

To find FA, we must use the free body diagram for the pulley:

The pulley is not accelerating, so we have:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ F_

Unknown macro: {A}

- 2T = 0 ]\end

Thus, using the results of Part B, we have:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ F_

Unknown macro: {A}

= \frac{4m_

Unknown macro: {1}

m_

Unknown macro: {2}

g}{m_

+m_{2}}]\end

We can then substitute to find:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \frac{4m_

Unknown macro: {2}

m_

Unknown macro: {1}

g}{m_

+m_{2}} - m_

Unknown macro: {1}

g - m_

g = (m_

Unknown macro: {1}

+m_

Unknown macro: {2}

)a_

Unknown macro: {cm,y}

]\end

Which gives:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[a_

Unknown macro: {cm}

= \frac{(-m_

Unknown macro: {1}

^

Unknown macro: {2}
  • m_

^

Unknown macro: {2}

+ 2m_

m_

Unknown macro: {2}

)g}{(m_

Unknown macro: {1}

+m_

)^{2}} = \frac{(m_

Unknown macro: {1}

-m_

Unknown macro: {2}

)(m_

-m_

)g}{(m_

Unknown macro: {1}

+m_

Unknown macro: {2}

)^{2}} ]\end

which agrees with the problem statement.

Note that it is impossible to understand the center of mass acceleration using our "mathematically equivalent" system of Part A Method 2.

deck: com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException
Unknown macro: {table}
Unknown macro: {tr}
Unknown macro: {td}

[Examples from Dynamics]

Unknown macro: {tr}
Unknown macro: {td}
The root page Examples from Dynamics could not be found in space Modeling Applied to Problem Solving.
Unknown macro: {search-box}
  • No labels