You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 21 Next »

Part A


Velodromes are indoor facilities for bicycle racing (picture by Keith Finlay, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons). Olympic velodromes are usually ovals 250 m in circumference with turns of radius 25 m. The peak banking in the turns is about 42°. Assuming a racer goes through the turn in such a velodrome at the optimal speed so that no friction is required to complete the turn, how fast is the racer moving?

System: The rider will be treated as a point particle. The rider is subject to external influence from the earth (gravity) and from the track (normal force). We assume friction is not present, since we are told to determine the speed at which friction is unnecessary to complete the turn.

Model: Point Particle Dynamics.

Approach:
Since we are assuming no friction is needed, we have the free body diagram and coordinate system shown above. The corresponding equations of Newton's Second Law are:

Notice that we have used a true vertical y-axis and true horizontal x-axis. The reason will become clear in a moment.


{latex}\begin{large}[\sum F_{x} = N \sin\theta = \frac{mv^{2}}{r} ][\sum F_{y} = N \cos\theta - mg = 0 ] \end{large}{latex}

Where r is the radius of the turn, v is the speed of the racer and m is the racer's mass (including bike and gear).

The situation here is very different than that of an object sliding down an inclined plane. In the case of an object moving along the plane, the acceleration will have both x and y components. For an object moving along a banked curve, the object will not be moving up or down and so ay must be zero. The x-component of the acceleration will of course not be zero because the object is following the curve. This difference between motion along a banked curve and motion down an inclined plane is the reason we use tilted coordinates for the incline and traditional coordinates for the curve.

Because ay = 0 here, it is not appropriate to assume N = mg cosθ. That equation follows from assuming the object accelerates along the incline.



From the y-component equation, we find:
{latex}\begin{large} [ N = \frac{mg}{\cos\theta} ]\end{large}{latex}

Note both the similarity to the standard inclined plane formula and the important difference.



Substituting into the x-component equation then gives:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ v = \sqrt

Unknown macro: {grtantheta}

= 15 \:

Unknown macro: {rm m/s}

= 33 \:

Unknown macro: {rm mph}

]\end

Is this speed reasonable for a bike race?

Note that our result is independent of the mass of the rider. This is important, since otherwise it would be impractical to construct banked curves. Different people would require different bankings!

Part B

The Indianapolis Motor Speedway (site of the Indianapolis 500 race) has four turns that are each 0.25 miles long and banked at 9.2°. Supposing that each turn is 1/4 of a perfect circle, what is the minimum coefficient of friction necessary to keep an IndyCar traveling through the turn at 150 mph from skidding out of the turn?

System: The car plus contents will be treated as a point particle. The car will be subject to external influences from the earth (gravity) and from the track (normal force and friction).

Model: Point Particle Dynamics

Approach:

The free body diagram from Part A is modified to include friction, as shown above.

In this problem, it is not clear a priori which way friction should point. Under certain conditons friction will point up the incline while in others it will point down (can you describe the conditions for each case?). This ambiguity should not prevent you from solving. Simply guess a direction. If you guess wrong, your answer will come out negative which will indicate the correct direction.

The resulting form of Newton's Second Law is:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \sum F_

Unknown macro: {x}

= F_

Unknown macro: {f}

\cos\theta + N \sin\theta = \frac{mv^{2}}

Unknown macro: {r}

][ \sum F_

Unknown macro: {y}

= N \cos\theta - F_

\sin\theta - mg = 0] \end

We have three unknowns (N, Ff, and m) but only two equations. To solve, we must develop another constraint. To do so, we must notice a key phrase in the problem statement. We are asked to find the minimum coefficient of friction. The minimum coefficient will be the value such that the static friction force is maximized, satisfying:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[F_

Unknown macro: {f}

= \mu_

Unknown macro: {s}

N ] \end

Remember that the point of contact of tires with the road surface is static (unless the car is in a skid) so static friction applies here. That is the reason that there is a minimum coefficient.

Whenever static friction applies, it is important to justify using the equation Ff = μN, since it is also possible that Ff < μN.

With this substitution, we have:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ \sum F_

Unknown macro: {x}

= \mu_

Unknown macro: {s}

N \cos\theta + N \sin\theta = \frac{mv^{2}}

Unknown macro: {r}

][ \sum F_

Unknown macro: {y}

= N \cos\theta - \mu_

N \sin\theta - mg = 0] \end

Proceeding as in Part A:

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ N = \frac

Unknown macro: {mg}

{\cos\theta - \mu_

Unknown macro: {s}

\sin\theta} ]\end

which is then substituted into the y-component equation to give:

Unknown macro: {latex}

[ \mu_

Unknown macro: {s}

\ge \frac{\frac{v^{2}}

Unknown macro: {r}

\cos\theta - g \sin\theta}{\frac{v^

Unknown macro: {2}

}

\sin\theta + g \cos\theta}]\end

Unknown macro: {large}
  • No labels